Following my article yesterday about Jackie’s Academy, Jaclyn decided that this substack is unfit to be on the platform, posting this to her substack
You may notice a few things wrong with Jaclyn’s claims here
She says she has “overwhelming evidence” that Patrick Tomlinson doxxed her to a hate website, however the link she leaves has no evidence of that. It’s a long list of memes she has created.
I have only shown the posts Jaclyn has made, which means I have broken no rules
I am not Patrick Tomlison, which she admits I may not be but instead “one of his minions” This means Jaclyn thinks I should be banned because I mentioned someone she doesn’t like
Jaclyn has absolutley no argument to support herself. Her “evidence” is just memes she’s created and wrote some text over, she didn’t even try to refute my arguments she just tried to have me banned instead
Jaclyn isn’t interested if she’s correct or not, she’s only interested in directing donations to her many collection accounts. Here, she accidentally admits I was correct about the reason she was banned
I had to edit this screenshot and remove the information she posted because it could get me banned on this platform, yet Jaclyn refuses to accept responsibility for breaking the rules. She’s lying to her followers and saying it’s because she’s an activist.
I invite Jaclyn to try and use her substack to argue her point instead of calling for the banning of anyone she doesn’t like.
Until next time
Since you're posting her full name, I have to agree.
Patrick.
You couldn't pick a less mundane name than George Wilson, could you?